{"id":617,"date":"2021-07-17T10:46:23","date_gmt":"2021-07-17T09:46:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.iamas.org\/iccp\/?page_id=617"},"modified":"2021-07-19T11:34:04","modified_gmt":"2021-07-19T10:34:04","slug":"session-4-mixed-phase-clouds","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.iamas.org\/iccp\/session-4-mixed-phase-clouds\/","title":{"rendered":"Session 4 – Mixed phase clouds"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Oral session:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

S4.1 Microphysical cloud properties and cloud probes’ benchmark during the Pallas Cloud Experiments (PaCE).
Konstantinos Doulgeris*1<\/sup>, Ari Leskinen2<\/sup>, Mika Komppula2<\/sup>, David Brus1<\/sup>
1<\/sup>Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland, 2<\/sup>Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland<\/em> (video; position 0:00)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
S4.2 Liquid water content and effective radius retrievals in mixed-phase cloud layers from Cloud radar data based on the forward modeling
Yujun Qiu*1<\/sup>, Tom Choularton2<\/sup>, Jonny Crosier2<\/sup>
1<\/sup>Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, China, 2<\/sup>Centre for Atmospheric Science, SEAES,University of Manchester, UK<\/em> (video; position 15:35)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
S4.3 Aircraft Observations of Liquid and Ice in Midlatitude Mixed-Phase Clouds
Zhen Zhao*, Heng-chi Lei
Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences, China<\/em> (video; position 30:00)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
S4.4 Vertical profiles of cloud properties measured with a holographic imager on a cable car
Alexander Beck*, Jan Henneberger, Zamin A. Kanji, Ulrike Lohmann
Institute of Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland<\/em> (video; position 0:00)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
S4.5 A detailed examination of the microphysical processes leading to ice production within an orographic wintertime cloud with freezing drizzle
Jeffrey French*1<\/sup>, Sarah Tessendorf2<\/sup>, Darcy Jacobson1<\/sup>, Roy Rasmussen2<\/sup>, Bart Geerts1<\/sup>, Binod Pokharel1<\/sup>, Lulin Xue1<\/sup>, Pat Holbrook3<\/sup>, Mel Kunkel3<\/sup>, Derek Blestrud3<\/sup>, Shaun Parkinson3<\/sup>
1<\/sup>University of Wyoming, USA, 2<\/sup>NCAR\/RAL, USA, 3<\/sup>Idaho Power Company, USA<\/em> (video; position 15:12)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
S4.6 In-situ airborne observations of small ice in turbulent mixed phase altocumulus clouds.
Paul Barrett*1,2<\/sup>, Alan Blyth2,3<\/sup>, Philip R. A. Brown1<\/sup>, Zbigniew Ulanowski4<\/sup>
1<\/sup>Met Office, UK, 2<\/sup>University of Leeds School of Earth and Environment, Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, UK, 3<\/sup>National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, UK, 4<\/sup>Centre for Atmospheric and Instrumentation Research, University of Hertfordshire, UK<\/em> (video; position 31:22)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
S4.7 In situ and radar Doppler spectrum constraints of ice sticking efficiency and ice properties in a mid-latitude squall line
Marcus van Lier-Walqui*1,2<\/sup>, Ann Fridlind2<\/sup>, Andrew Ackerman2<\/sup>, Christopher Williams3<\/sup>, Greg McFarquhar4<\/sup>, Wei Wu4<\/sup>, Xiaowen Li5,6<\/sup>, Wei-Kuo Tao6<\/sup>, Alexei Korolev7<\/sup>
1<\/sup>Columbia University, USA, 2<\/sup>NASA Goddard Institute For Space Studies, USA, 3<\/sup>University of Colorado, USA, 4<\/sup>University of Illinois, USA, 5<\/sup>Morgan State University, USA, 6<\/sup>NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, 7<\/sup>Environment Canada, Canada<\/em> (video; position 0:00)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
S4.8 LIMA: A two-moment microphysical scheme driven by a multimodal population of cloud condensation and ice freezing nuclei
Jean-Pierre Pinty*1<\/sup>, Beno\u00eet Vi\u00e92<\/sup>, Sarah Berthet3<\/sup>, Maud Leriche1<\/sup>
1<\/sup>Laboratoire d’A\u00e9rologie, UMR5560, CNRS\/Universit\u00e9 de Toulouse, France, 2<\/sup>M\u00e9t\u00e9o-France, UMR3589, CNRS\/M\u00e9t\u00e9o-France, France, 3<\/sup>LEGOS, UMR5566, CNES\/CNRS\/IRD\/Universit\u00e9 de Toulouse, France<\/em>
(video; position 15:00)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
S4.9 Microphysics parameterization of explicit partial melting of snow to study the formation of freezing rain and ice pellets
M\u00e9lissa Cholette*, Julie M. Th\u00e9riault
University of Quebec at Montreal, Canada<\/em> (video; position 31:00)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
S4.10 Effect of Evaporation on Midlatitude Continental Convective Clouds Experiment (MC3E) Melting Layer Simulations
Andrea Neumann*1<\/sup>, Michael Poellot1<\/sup>, Andrew Heymsfield2<\/sup>, Aaron Bansemer2<\/sup>
1<\/sup>University of North Dakota, USA, 2<\/sup>National Center for Atmospheric Research, USA<\/em> (video; position 0:00)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
S.4.11 Synthesis of observations and models using a new Bayesian framework for microphysical parameterization
Hugh Morrison1<\/sup>, Marcus van Lier-Walqui*2<\/sup>, Matthew Kumjian3<\/sup>, Olivier Prat4<\/sup>
1<\/sup>NCAR, USA, 2<\/sup>Columbia University, USA, 3<\/sup>Pennsylvania State University, USA, 4<\/sup>North Carolina State University, USA<\/em> (video; position 15:00)<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
S4.12 Relationship between atmospheric aerosols, hail and polarimetric radar signatures in a mid-latitude storm
Eyal Ilotoviz1<\/sup>, Alexander Khain*1<\/sup>, Vaughan Phillips2<\/sup>, Alexander Ryzhkov3<\/sup>
1<\/sup>The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, 2<\/sup>Lund University, Sweden, 3<\/sup>University of Oklahoma, USA<\/em>
(video; position 30:31)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Poster session:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

P4.1 Analysis on the microphysical features of raindrop size distribution under different synoptic systems in mountainous area Fujian
Lin Wen*1<\/sup>, Lin Changcheng1<\/sup>, Yao Zhanyu2<\/sup>, Chen Binbin1<\/sup>, Li Dan1<\/sup>, Zheng Wenjun3<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>Fujian Meteorological Science Institute, China, 2<\/sup>Chinese Academy of Meteorological Science, China, 3<\/sup>Youxi Meteorological Bureau, China<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.2 Investigation of Riming within Mixed-phase Stratiform Clouds Using Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model
Tuanjie Hou*, Hengchi Lei, Zhaoxia Hu
Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.3 Investigation of Mass-Dimension Relationship Parameters Within a Surface of Equally Realizable Solutions
Joseph Finlon*1,3<\/sup>, Greg McFarquhar1,3<\/sup>, Robert Rauber1<\/sup>, Brian Jewett1<\/sup>, David Plummer1,2<\/sup>, Roy Rasmussen3<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA, 2<\/sup>University of Wyoming, USA, 3<\/sup>National Center for Atmospheric Research, USA<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.4 Diffusion processes in mixed-phase clouds involving direct particle interactions
Manuel Baumgartner*, Peter Spichtinger
Johannes Gutenberg University, Germany<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.5 Aerosol-cloud interactions over the Arctic using the Canadian atmospheric chemistry model GEM-MACH
Ana Cirisan*1<\/sup>, Sylvie Gravel2<\/sup>, Wanmin Gong3<\/sup>, Vickie Irish4<\/sup>, Allan Bertram4<\/sup>, \u00c9ric Girard1<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>Universit\u00e9 du Qu\u00e9bec \u00e0 Montr\u00e9al, Canada, 2<\/sup>Canadian Meteorological Centre, Canada, 3<\/sup>Environment Canada, Canada, 4<\/sup>Department of Chemistry, The University of British Columbia, Canada<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.6 Modeling the melting of graupel and hail in a bulk microphysics parameterization
Axel Seifert*1<\/sup>, Vivek Sant2<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>Deutscher Wetterdienst, Germany, 2<\/sup>Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Germany<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.7 Implementing ice microphysics to a large eddy simulation model coupled with sectional aerosol module
Jaakko Ahola*1,3<\/sup>, Tomi Raatikainen1<\/sup>, Juha Tonttila2<\/sup>, Sami Romakkaniemi2<\/sup>, Hannele Korhonen1<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland, 2<\/sup>Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland, 3<\/sup>University of Turku, Finland<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.8 Model simulations with COSMO-SPECS: Application of prognostic INP description for stratiform clouds
Martin Simmel*1<\/sup>, Matthias Lieber2<\/sup>, Oswald Knoth1<\/sup>, Ina Tegen1<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>TROPOS Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Germany, 2<\/sup>Center for Information Services and High Performance Computing (ZIH), TU Dresden, Germany<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.9 Comparison of large eddy simulation models for arctic clouds
Tomi Raatikainen*1<\/sup>, Jaakko Ahola1<\/sup>, Juha Tonttila2<\/sup>, Sami Romakkaniemi2<\/sup>, Ari Laaksonen1<\/sup>, Hannele Korhonen1<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland, 2<\/sup>Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.10 The Importance of Soil Dust for Mixed-phase Clouds in Global Climate Models
Luisa Ickes*, Tanja Stanelle, Ulrike Lohmann
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Switzerland<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.11 Aircraft measurements of  mixed-phase clouds versus cloud-resolving modeling studies in Northern China
Xueliang Guo*, Shichao Zhu, Guangxian Lu, Lijun Guo
Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, China<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.12 Formation and development of orographic mixed phase clouds in real cases
Olga Henneberg*, Ulrike Lohmann, Jan Henneberger
ETH Zurich, Switzerland<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.13 An LES study on the role of ship induced ACI in mixed-phase stratocumulus
Anna Possner*1<\/sup>, Annica Ekman2<\/sup>, Ulrike Lohmann1<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 2<\/sup>Stockholm University, Sweden<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.14 The evolution and precipitation production of an orographic wintertime cloud with freezing drizzle
Sarah Tessendorf*1<\/sup>, Jeffrey French2<\/sup>, Courtney Weeks1<\/sup>, Roy Rasmussen1<\/sup>, Bart Geerts2<\/sup>, Binod Pokharel2<\/sup>, Lulin Xue1<\/sup>, Pat Holbrook3<\/sup>, Derek Blestrud3<\/sup>, Melvin Kunkel3<\/sup>, Shaun Parkinson3<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>NCAR\/RAL, USA, 2<\/sup>University of Wyoming, USA, 3<\/sup>Idaho Power Company, USA<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.15 Modelling of water stable isotope ratios in a 1.5D bin-resolved microphysics model
Andrea Flossmann*1,2<\/sup>, Wolfram Wobrock1,2<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>LaMP\/UBP, France, 2<\/sup>INSU\/CNRS, France<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.16 Ground based in situ measurements of arctic cloud microphysical and optical properties at Mount Zeppelin, Svalbard
Guyot gwennol\u00e9*1<\/sup>, Jourdan Olivier1<\/sup>, Olofson Frans1<\/sup>, Schwarzenboeck Alfons1<\/sup>, Gourbeyre Christophe1<\/sup>, Febvre Guy1<\/sup>, Dupuy R\u00e9gis1<\/sup>, Bernard Christophe2<\/sup>, Tunved Peter3<\/sup>, Ancellet G\u00e9rard4<\/sup>, Law Kathy4<\/sup>, Wobrock Wolfram1<\/sup>, Shcherbakov Valery1<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>LaMP, France, 2<\/sup>OPGC, France, 3<\/sup>Department of Applied Environmental Science, Sweden, 4<\/sup>LATMOS, France<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.17 Identification of super-cooled liquid layers in mixed-phase clouds based on cloud radar observations
Anne Hirsikko1<\/sup>, Ewan O’Connor1,2<\/sup>, Mika Komppula3<\/sup>, Sami Romakkaniemi*3<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland, 2<\/sup>University of Reading, UK, 3<\/sup>Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.18 Understanding microphysical controls on arctic stratus clouds: A comparison of high-resolution NWP models during the ASCOS field campaign
Christopher Dearden*1<\/sup>, Robin Stevens2<\/sup>, Anna Possner3<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>University of Manchester, UK, 2<\/sup>University of Leeds, UK, 3<\/sup>ETH, Switzerland<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.19 Response of mixed-phase boundary layer clouds with predominantly rapid or slow ice nucleation processes to cloud-top temperature trend
Ann Fridlind*1<\/sup>, Alexander Avramov2<\/sup>, Andrew Ackerman1<\/sup>, Peter Alpert3<\/sup>, Daniel Knopf4<\/sup>, Paul DeMott5<\/sup>, Sarah Brooks6<\/sup>, Andrew Glen6<\/sup>
1<\/sup><\/em>NASA GISS, USA, 2<\/sup>MIT, USA, 3<\/sup>CNRS, France, 4<\/sup>Stony Brook University, USA, 5<\/sup>Colorado State University, USA, 6<\/sup>Texas A&M University, USA<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
P4.20 A model for a turbulent mixed-phase cloud
Ben Devenish
Met Office, UK<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Oral session: S4.1 Microphysical cloud properties and cloud probes’ benchmark during the Pallas Cloud Experiments (PaCE).Konstantinos Doulgeris*1, Ari Leskinen2, Mika Komppula2, David Brus11Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland, 2Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland (video; position 0:00) S4.2 Liquid water content and effective radius retrievals in mixed-phase cloud layers from Cloud radar data based on the forward modelingYujun Qiu*1, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"cybocfi_hide_featured_image":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-617","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iamas.org\/iccp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iamas.org\/iccp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iamas.org\/iccp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iamas.org\/iccp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.iamas.org\/iccp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=617"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.iamas.org\/iccp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/617\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":672,"href":"https:\/\/www.iamas.org\/iccp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/617\/revisions\/672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.iamas.org\/iccp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}